Skip to main content
Home
Close
AccessLex Logo
  • About AccessLex
    • About AccessLex
    • Management Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Center for Legal Education Excellence
    • Center for Legal Education Excellence
    • Research and Data
    • Policy and Advocacy
    • Programs for Diversity
    • Programs for Academic and Bar Success
    • Grant Programs
  • Center for Education and Financial Capability
    • Center for Education and Financial Capability
    • Financial Education Resources for Students
    • Resources for Administrators
    • Pre-Law Services
    • Meet the Team
    • Our Member Law Schools
  • XBlog
  • Library of Resources
    • Library of Resources
    • Research Publications
    • MAX by AccessLex
    • Student Loan Calculator
    • AccessConnex by AccessLex
    • Analytix by AccessLex
    • Conference and Events

Graduate Students Won’t PROSPER

Published
April 24, 2018
Print this page
Share this page

Graduate Students Likely Won’t Fare Well Under PROSPER Repayment Framework

Plenty of digital ink has been spilled articulating the numerous detrimental effects the House Higher Education Act (HEA) reauthorization bill, known as the PROSPER Act, would have on students and families. But as a potential law student, or really any graduate or professional student, are you getting a better deal under PROSPER than you would be under current federal policy?

In a word: No.

If a goal of PROSPER is, as it should be, to make graduate education more affordable or to help student borrowers better manage their loan repayments, the bill falls short. In fact, it does the exact opposite in many cases. Under PROSPER’s proposed changes to the federal student loan programs, graduate and professional borrowers will lose out the most.

The bill’s authors assert PROSPER’s reforms will simplify and improve student aid and that the proposals outlined will help students borrow responsibly. Those are certainly laudable goals, but the bill seems to miss two of the largest problems facing higher education today: maintaining access and increasing affordability. Strikingly, no language in the materials promoting the bill explicitly states how PROSPER’s proposals address making higher education more accessible or making paying for school more affordable. That is probably because, at least for most graduate and professional students, it won’t.

Here’s an example:

Let’s say you went to a three-year graduate school in the Midwest where the tuition was around $27,000 a year. Adding your books, fees, living expenses and other items, your total cost of attendance was around $47,000 per year. Thus, you needed to borrow a total of $141,000 to graduate. Because PROSPER has annual loan limits, you had to take out both federal loans and private loans to finance your education. You consolidate both your federal and private loans with totals of $85,500 and $55,000, respectively.

You currently make enough to have an adjusted gross income of $60,000 with no children, spouse, or other complex financial situations. This means you would likely end up initially paying over $1,000 a month for your student loans before you paid rent or bought food to eat. That is well over 25% of your discretionary income! Compare those figures with the fact you would be initially paying around $350 (or 10% of discretionary income) under current federal policy.

That’s an easy choice.

While this is just one example, it is indicative of how many graduate and professional students would be harmed by the loan policies in PROSPER. You will pay more and, in many instances, pay longer for graduate education under this new proposal. You can read a more detailed explanation of this example above here.

If you want to get involved and ensure these policies are not enacted, visit our #MakeTheCase advocacy page. If you are a student, please visit our student advocacy campaign site. Among other tips and resources, we created a one-pager with a few other examples of graduate student repayment scenarios, differentiated by school type, under PROSPER to use when advocating for better student loan policies.

View the Full Brief.

View other sample PROSPER repayment scenarios.

Print this page
Share this page

Recent News

  • Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 7
  • Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 6
  • Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 5
  • Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 4
  • Higher Ed Policy Roundup Vol. 3 - Issue 3
  • Make Your Voice Heard – Here’s How
View More

Related News and Resources

news

Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 7

Feb 15, 2019
news

Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 6

Feb 8, 2019
news

Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 5

Feb 1, 2019
news

Higher Ed Policy Roundup: Vol. 3 - Issue 4

Jan 25, 2019
Determine the true cost of law school.
Crunch Your Numbers
Get answers to your student loan repayment questions.
Launch AccessConnex

AccessLex Institute®

  • About AccessLex
  • Our Board of Directors
  • The Management Team
  • Audited Financials
  • Contact Us
  • Careers at AccessLex

AccessLex Center for Legal Education Excellence®

  • Research and Data
  • Policy and Advocacy
  • Diversity and Success
  • Analytix by AccessLex

AccessLex Center for Education and Financial Capability®

  • Financial Education
  • Resources for Administrators
  • Education Services Team
  • MAX by AccessLex
AccessLex Institute Logo

Corporate Office

10 North High Street
Suite 400
West Chester, PA 19380

Washington D.C. Office

440 First Street NW
Suite 550
Washington, D.C. 20001

  • Terms of Use
  • Access Group Education Lending
  • Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2019
AccessLex Institute® ACCESSLEX® and other logos or trademarks herein are trademarks of AccessLex Institute® All rights reserved.